Many of my musician friends, including a few in this band, find ourselves at times discussing (and often debating) the merits and demerits of musicians who are incredibly skilled on their instruments.
These geniuses practice four or more hours a day and can flawlessly perform any piece of music either placed in front of them or within hearing three notes of the first chorus.
Then there are other musicians who, well, are not as blessed. They work hard, are dedicated to their craft, but can’t seem to break the threshold of greatness. In many ways, they employ the same approaches in their soloing, technique and they tend to settle into a comfortability that, in many ways prohibits them from stretching beyond familiar boundaries.
Yet, and here’s where the debates usually surface, many of the latter described musicians are far more popular than their counterparts, because they possess a gene that makes an immediate emotional connection with their audience, which more than makes up for their technical deficiencies.
It’s often here where the question is raised, “Well, should we accept and support mediocrity and sub-par musicians?”
In my opinion, absolutely not – artistic excellence is a virtue every musician should strive for. But, we must observe and appreciate the uniqueness – and the spirit, vibe and aura that each one brings to the table.
I have been to shows where the virtuoso used every single note on their instrument with masterful fluency. Their expert facility of timing, technique and proficiency was unmatched and among the 47 or so of us shouldering the responsibility of keeping each other awake, we agreed that this musician was going to be the next Chick or Herbie, but he failed to reach us. He didn’t talk to us, or look us in the eye or smile, nor make any attempts to connect.
Then there were the concerts where the lady played in the same key most of the night, with minor inversions on the same 12 chords, but grinned, grunted, sweated & screamed and took us on an unbelievable journey for three straight hours, because her spirit created an enviroment of purity and euphoria. We FELT the music!
So, which is better?
My music collection is a potpourri of musicians and artists who scale the plane from absolutely superb to the “well…” but I enjoy and support their artistry just as strongly – and in some ways even more so. But then, my DNA gravitates more toward what I feel, than what’s most tecnically correct.
I can feel James Brown everyday (!) although I absolutely appreciate and enjoy the brilliance of Endar (check him out). The Five Blind Boys play next to Pat Methaney in my CD rotation. P-Funk shares as much real estate as Duke Ellington. I’m that Dude.
I also tend to think the best of both worlds include the musicians who are equally adept at their instruments but always invite me along for the ride. Artists like the late Michael Brecker (who incidentally recorded and toured with P-Funk early on), Herbie Hancock, Stevie, Prince, the late Jimmy Smith, B.B King and many plenty others of unknown, unsigned and under the radar who make this universe of music a place we can see, feel and hold in the palm of our own souls while stretching our imaginations.
I can’t help but to draw a slight analogy to this final presidential election result, where Mr. Obama had the charisma to make us feel something, along with proving himself a man of character who is skilled and ready for the task at hand.
To me (as I shared previously), although acknowledging and welcoming this profound moment in history, was always ready – and willing – to vote for the best prepared candidate. But Mr. McCain failed to connect and whether better prepared or not, had to concede to the one who made the majority of the populace feel he is the better choice.